Re: [PATCH net] bnxt: do not busy-poll when link is down
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Date: 2016-11-22 18:55:54
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 13:14 -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:quoted
When busy polling while a link is down (during a link-flap test), TX timeouts were observed as well as the following messages in the ring buffer: bnxt_en 0008:01:00.2 enP8p1s0f2d2: Resp cmpl intr err msg: 0x51 bnxt_en 0008:01:00.2 enP8p1s0f2d2: hwrm_ring_free tx failed. rc:-1 bnxt_en 0008:01:00.2 enP8p1s0f2d2: Resp cmpl intr err msg: 0x51 bnxt_en 0008:01:00.2 enP8p1s0f2d2: hwrm_ring_free rx failed. rc:-1 These were resolved by checking for link status and returning if link was not up. Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <redacted> Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com> Tested-by: Rob Miller <redacted> --- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c index e18635b..013e373 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c@@ -1811,6 +1811,9 @@ static int bnxt_busy_poll(struct napi_struct *napi) if (atomic_read(&bp->intr_sem) != 0) return LL_FLUSH_FAILED; + if (!bp->link_info.link_up) + return LL_FLUSH_FAILED; + if (!bnxt_lock_poll(bnapi)) return LL_FLUSH_BUSY;Any plans removing this busy polling stuff, now it is done in core networking stack ? This would remove bnxt_lock_napi() extra overhead in normal path ( napi poll ) I could do this but I do not have the hardware to do the tests.
It's on my list of many TODO things. Probably in the next few weeks.