From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 06:52:31 -0800
On 16-11-11 04:43 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 08:28:50AM +0000, Yotam Gigi wrote:
...
quoted
John, as a result of your question I realized that our hardware does do
randomized sampling that I was not aware of. I will use the extensibility of
the API and implement a random keyword, that will be offloaded in our
hardware. Those changes will be sent on v2.
Eventually, your question was very relevant :) Thanks!
Perhaps I am missing the point but why not just make random the default and
implement the inverse as an extension if it turns out to be needed in
future?
+1 just implement the random one.
Agreed.