Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-08-29

Re: [PATCH] mISDN: mark symbols static where possible

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2016-08-29 12:21:25
Also in: lkml

On Monday 29 August 2016, Baoyou Xie wrote:
We get 1 warning when biuld kernel with W=1:
drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/w6692.c:851:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'initW6692' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared
and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
so this patch marks it 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <redacted>
---
 drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/w6692.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The patch looks good, but now you have sent two different patches with the same subject
line. Since this is just one driver and each instance is a trivial change, I'd suggest
doing a single combined patch for them.

Similarly, when you have multiple patches within one subsystem (e.g. two different scsi
drivers), it helps to have a series of patches as you did with the ASoC patches.

	Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help