[PATCH] mISDN: mark symbols static where possible

We get 1 warning when biuld kernel with W=1:
drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/w6692.c:851:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'initW6692' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared
and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
so this patch marks it 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <redacted>
---
 drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/w6692.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/w6692.c b/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/w6692.c
index 7416755..3b067ea 100644
--- a/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/w6692.c
+++ b/drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/w6692.c

@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ dbusy_timer_handler(struct dchannel *dch)
 	}
 }
 
-void initW6692(struct w6692_hw *card)
+static void initW6692(struct w6692_hw *card)
 {
 	u8	val;
 

-- 
2.7.4

On Monday 29 August 2016, Baoyou Xie wrote:

We get 1 warning when biuld kernel with W=1:
drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/w6692.c:851:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'initW6692' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared
and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
so this patch marks it 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <redacted>
---
 drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/w6692.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

The patch looks good, but now you have sent two different patches with the same subject
line. Since this is just one driver and each instance is a trivial change, I'd suggest
doing a single combined patch for them.

Similarly, when you have multiple patches within one subsystem (e.g. two different scsi
drivers), it helps to have a series of patches as you did with the ASoC patches.

	Arnd