Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: hisilicon: Add Fast Ethernet MAC driver
From: Dongpo Li <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-11 08:41:38
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On 2016/7/11 16:16, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2016 11:44:23 AM CEST Dongpo Li wrote:quoted
Hi Arnd, On 2016/6/28 17:34, Arnd Bergmann wrote:quoted
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 5:21:19 PM CEST Dongpo Li wrote:quoted
On 2016/6/15 5:20, Arnd Bergmann wrote:quoted
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 9:17:44 PM CEST Li Dongpo wrote:quoted
On 2016/6/13 17:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:quoted
On Monday, June 13, 2016 2:07:56 PM CEST Dongpo Li wrote: You tx function uses BQL to optimize the queue length, and that is great. You also check xmit reclaim for rx interrupts, so as long as you have both rx and tx traffic, this should work great. However, I notice that you only have a 'tx fifo empty' interrupt triggering the napi poll, so I guess on a tx-only workload you will always end up pushing packets into the queue until BQL throttles tx, and then get the interrupt after all packets have been sent, which will cause BQL to make the queue longer up to the maximum queue size, and that negates the effect of BQL. Is there any way you can get a tx interrupt earlier than this in order to get a more balanced queue, or is it ok to just rely on rx packets to come in occasionally, and just use the tx fifo empty interrupt as a fallback?In tx direction, there are only two kinds of interrupts, 'tx fifo empty' and 'tx one packet finish'. I didn't use 'tx one packet finish' because it would lead to high hardware interrupts rate. This has been verified in our chips. It's ok to just use tx fifo empty interrupt.I'm not convinced by the explanation, I don't think that has anything to do with the hardware design, but instead is about the correctness of the BQL logic with your driver. Maybe your xmit function can do something like if (dql_avail(netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, 0)->dql) < 0) enable per-packet interrupt else use only fifo-empty interrupt That way, you don't get a lot of interrupts when the system is in a state of packets being received and sent continuously, but if you get to the point where your tx queue fills up and no rx interrupts arrive, you don't have to wait for it to become completely empty before adding new packets, and BQL won't keep growing the queue.Hi, Arnd I tried enable per-packet interrupt when tx queue full in xmit function and disable it in NAPI poll. But the number of interrupts are a little bigger than only using fifo-empty interrupt.Right, I'd expect that to be the case, it basically means that the algorithm works as expected. Just to be sure you didn't have extra interrupts: you only enable the per-packet interrupts if interrupts are currently enabled, not in NAPI polling mode, right?Sorry so long to reply to you. I use the per-packet interrupt like this: In my xmit function, if (hardware tx fifo is full) { enable tx per-packet interrupt; netif_stop_queue(dev); return NETDEV_TX_BUSY; } In interrupt handle function, if (interrupt is tx per-packet or tx fifo-empty or rx) { disable tx per-packet interrupt; napi_schedule(&priv->napi); } We disable tx per-packet interrupt anyway because the NAPI poll will reclaim the tx fifo. When the NAPI poll completed, it will only enable the tx fifo-empty interrupt and rx interrupt except the tx per-packet interrupt. Is this solution okay?Yes, this looks good to me.
Okay, many thanks for your review.
Arnd .
Regards,
Dongpo
.