On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 08:57:53PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 10:50 +0000, David Laight wrote:
quoted
quoted
+ if (!is_valid_ether_addr(mac)) {
+ mac[5] = (m >> 8) & 0xff;
+ mac[4] = m & 0xff;
+ mac[3] = (l >> 24) & 0xff;
+ mac[2] = (l >> 16) & 0xff;
+ mac[1] = (l >> 8) & 0xff;
+ mac[0] = l & 0xff;
+ }
...
That is horrid, not all byte reversed addresses will be invalid.
Right, that's just a hack for a broken vendor uboot we had here, Gavin,
drop that part of the patch please.
Sure, I'll drop it in v4 or a followup patch. v3 is being reviewed this
moment.
Thanks,
Gavin