Thread (30 messages) flat view 30 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-14

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next v2 12/12] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add addressing mode to info

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2016-06-14 22:44:30
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 06:24:17PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
Hi Andrew,

Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
-	ret = mdiobus_read_nested(bus, addr, reg);
+	ret = mdiobus_read_nested(bus, sw_addr + addr, reg);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
If we are doing direct access, doesn't it means sw_addr is 0?

So isn't this pointless?
6060 has no indirect access and directly responds to 16 SMI addresses,
regardless its chip address which can be strapped to either 0 or 16.
Ah! O.K.

wnr854t-setup.c uses 0.
rd88f6183ap-ge-setup.c uses 0.
wrt350n-v2-setup.c uses 0.
rd88f5181l-fxo-setup.c uses 0.
rd88f5181l-ge-setup.c uses 0.
mach-bf518/boards/ezbrd.c uses 0.

The 6060 is a very old device. I doubt we will get any new boards
contributed using it. We are also going to have trouble actually
finding a device with one in order to test a merged mv88e6xxx and
mv88e6060 driver.

So i say we ignore the possibility of an 6060 on 16, until one really
comes along.
Question 2) is MV88E6XXX_FLAG_MULTI_CHIP confusing?
No, i think it is fine.

    Andrew
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help