Hi Javier,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hello Julian,
Thanks a lot for your feedback and reviews.
On 06/01/2016 12:20 AM, Julian Calaby wrote:
quoted
Hi All,
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/marvell-sd8xxx.txt DT
binding document say that the "interrupts" property in the child node is
optional. So the property being missed shouldn't be treated as an error.
Have you checked whether it is truly optional? I.e. nothing else
breaks if this property isn't set?
That's what the DT binding says and the IRQ is only used as a wakeup source
during system suspend, it is not used during runtime. And that is why the
mwifiex_sdio_probe_of() function does not fail if the IRQ is missing.
Awesome, that's what I wanted to know.
Now, I just got to that conclusion by reading the binding docs, the message
in the commits that introduced this and the driver code. Xinming Hu should
comment on how critical this feature is for systems that needs to be wakeup.
Xinming, could you review this also?
In any case I think that the code should be consistent with what the binding
doc says and also the function does (i.e: dev_err only if returns an error).
quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <redacted>
Other than that, this looks sensible to me.
Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby <redacted>
Best regards,
Thanks,
--
Julian Calaby
Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/