From: Eric Dumazet
Sent: 09 June 2016 22:17
On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 23:50 +0300, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
quoted
From: Matthew Finlay <redacted>
quoted
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index a1bd161..67de200 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ struct file *sock_alloc_file(struct socket *sock, int flags, const char *dname)
}
sock->file = file;
+ file->f_owner.sock_pid = find_get_pid(task_pid_nr(current));
file->f_flags = O_RDWR | (flags & O_NONBLOCK);
file->private_data = sock;
return file;
Wow, that is a serious memory leak weapon (of struct pid)
Why don't you store the pid value, instead of a pointer ?
Since the numeric 'pid' values can be reused (with no grace time) you'd
need to hold a reference to the pid structure (added in about 2.6.27) instead.
Which is just a smaller memory leak!
(and annoyingly a non-gpl driver can't drop a reference to it).
David