Re: Softirq priority inversion from "softirq: reduce latencies"
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2016-02-27 23:04:09
Also in:
lkml
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2016-02-27 23:04:09
Also in:
lkml
From: Peter Hurley <redacted> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:29:39 -0800
Not really. softirq raised from interrupt context will always execute on this cpu and not in ksoftirqd, unless load forces softirq loop abort.
That guarantee never was specified. Or are you saying that by design, on a system under load, your UART will not function properly? Surely you don't mean that.