Re: [net-next PATCH 06/11] RFC: mlx5: RX bulking or bundling of packets before calling network stack
From: Saeed Mahameed <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-09 12:15:40
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer [off-list ref] wrote:
There are several techniques/concepts combined in this optimization. It is both a data-cache and instruction-cache optimization. First of all, this is primarily about delaying touching packet-data, which happend in eth_type_trans, until the prefetch have had time to fetch. Thus, hopefully avoiding a cache-miss on packet data. Secondly, the instruction-cache optimization is about, not calling the network stack for every packet, which is pulled out of the RX ring. Calling the full stack likely removes/flushes the instruction cache every time. Thus, have two loops, one loop pulling out packet from the RX ring and starting the prefetching, and the second loop calling eth_type_trans() and invoking the stack via napi_gro_receive(). Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <redacted> Notes: This is the patch that gave a speed up of 6.2Mpps to 12Mpps, when trying to measure lowest RX level, by dropping the packets in the driver itself (marked drop point as comment).
Indeed looks very promising in respect of instruction-cache optimization, but i have some doubts regarding the data-cache optimizations (prefetch), please see my below questions. We will take this patch and test it in house.
For now, the ring is emptied upto the budget. I don't know if it would be better to chunk it up more?
Not sure, according to netdevice.h : /* Default NAPI poll() weight * Device drivers are strongly advised to not use bigger value */ #define NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT 64 we will also compare different budget values with your approach, but I doubt it will be accepted to increase the NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT for mlx5 drivers. furthermore increasing NAPI poll budget might cause cache overflow with this approach since you are chunking up all "prefetch(skb->data)" (I didn't do the math yet in regards of cache utilization with this approach).
mlx5e_handle_csum(netdev, cqe, rq, skb); - skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, netdev); -
mlx5e_handle_csum also access the skb->data in is_first_ethertype_ip function, but i think it is not interesting since this is not the common case, e.g: for the none common case of L4 traffic with no HW checksum offload you won't benefit from this optimization since we access the skb->data to know the L3 header type, and this can be fixed in driver code to check the CQE meta data for these fields instead of accessing the skb->data, but I will need to look further into that.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -252,7 +257,6 @@ int mlx5e_poll_rx_cq(struct mlx5e_cq *cq, int budget) wqe_counter = be16_to_cpu(wqe_counter_be); wqe = mlx5_wq_ll_get_wqe(&rq->wq, wqe_counter); skb = rq->skb[wqe_counter]; - prefetch(skb->data); rq->skb[wqe_counter] = NULL; dma_unmap_single(rq->pdev,@@ -265,16 +269,27 @@ int mlx5e_poll_rx_cq(struct mlx5e_cq *cq, int budget) dev_kfree_skb(skb); goto wq_ll_pop; } + prefetch(skb->data);
is this optimal for all CPU archs ? is it ok to use up to 64 cache lines at once ?