Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dev: add batching to net_device notifiers
From: Salam Noureddine <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-03 06:31:08
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Julian Anastasov [off-list ref] wrote:
Hello, On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, Salam Noureddine wrote:quoted
@@ -1572,8 +1582,12 @@ rollback:
quoted
call_netdevice_notifier(nb, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, dev); + call_netdevice_notifier(nb, NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH, + dev);If the rule is once per net, the above call...quoted
}should be here: call_netdevice_notifier(nb, NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH, net->loopback_dev); and also once after outroll label?:
That's a good optimization to add. I was mostly focusing on the device unregister path.
call_netdevice_notifier(nb, NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH, last);quoted
}@@ -1614,8 +1628,12 @@ int unregister_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
quoted
call_netdevice_notifier(nb, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, dev); + call_netdevice_notifier(nb, NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH, + dev);Above call...quoted
}should be here, for net->loopback_dev? Also, is it ok to call NETDEV_DOWN_BATCH many times, as result, sometimes after NETDEV_UNREGISTER?
Same here, I can add this optimization. I think it is fine to call the BATCH notifiers for every interface. It is just better to do it for many interfaces at the same time.
quoted
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(net, net_tmp, &net_head, event_list) { + call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH, + net->loopback_dev); + net_del_event_list(net); + } +NETDEV_UNREGISTER* should not be called before following synchronize_net and NETDEV_UNREGISTER. May be we should split the loop: loop (dev_shutdown+NETDEV_UNREGISTER) followed by above NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH then again the loop for all remaining callsquoted
synchronize_net(); list_for_each_entry(dev, head, unreg_list)Regards -- Julian Anastasov [off-list ref]
The call to NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH is actually after NETDEV_UNREGISTER, it seems the other way around in the patch because it is showing part of netdev_wait_allrefs and not rollback_registered_may. Thanks, Salam