Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 3 authors, 2016-01-18

Re: net: hang in ip_finish_output

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-18 03:12:19
Also in: lkml
Subsystem: networking [general], the rest, user datagram protocol (udp) · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds, Willem de Bruijn

On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 23:29 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 19:20 -0500, Craig Gallek wrote:
quoted
I wasn't able to reproduce this exact stack trace, but I was able to
cause soft lockup messages with a fork bomb of your test program.  It
is certainly related to my recent SO_REUSEPORT change (reverting it
seems to fix the problem).  I haven't completely figured out the exact
cause yet, though.  Could you please post your configuration and
exactly how you are running this 'parallel loop'?
There is a problem in the lookup functions (udp4_lib_lookup2() &
__udp4_lib_lookup())

Because of RCU SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU semantics (check
Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt for some details), you should not
call reuseport_select_sock(sk, ...) without taking a stable reference on
the sk socket. (and checking the lookup keys again)

This is because sk could be freed, re-used by a totally different UDP
socket on a different port, and the incoming frame(s) could be delivered
on the wrong socket/channel/application :(

Note that we discussed some time ago to remove SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU for
UDP sockets (and freeing them after rcu grace period instead), so make
UDP rx path faster, as we would no longer need to increment/decrement
the socket refcount. This also would remove the added false sharing on
sk_refcnt for the case the UDP socket serves as a tunnel (up->encap_rcv
being non NULL)
Hmm... not it looks you do the lookup , refcnt change, re-lookup just
fine.

The problem here is that UDP connected sockets update the
sk->sk_incoming_cpu from __udp_queue_rcv_skb()

This means that we can find the first socket in hash table with a
matching incoming cpu, and badness == high_score + 1

Then, the reuseport_select_sock() can selects another socket from the
array (using bpf or the hash )

We do the atomic_inc_not_zero_hint() to update sk_refcnt on the new
socket, then compute_score2() returns high_score (< badness)

So we loop back to the beginning of udp4_lib_lookup2(), and we loop
forever (as long as the first socket in hash table has still this match
about incoming cpu)

In short, the recent SO_REUSE_PORT changes are not compatible with the
SO_INCOMING_CPU ones, if connected UDP sockets are used.

A fix could be to not check sk_incoming_cpu on connected sockets (this
makes really little sense, as this option was meant to spread traffic on
UDP _servers_ ). Also it collides with SO_REUSEPORT notion of a group of
sockets having the same score.

Dmitry, could you test it ? I could not get the trace you reported.
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index dc45b538e237..f76cf0ec82b1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -413,6 +413,8 @@ static inline int compute_score(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
 		if (inet->inet_daddr != saddr)
 			return -1;
 		score += 4;
+	} else if (sk->sk_incoming_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) {
+		score++;
 	}
 
 	if (inet->inet_dport) {
@@ -426,8 +428,6 @@ static inline int compute_score(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
 			return -1;
 		score += 4;
 	}
-	if (sk->sk_incoming_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
-		score++;
 	return score;
 }
 
@@ -457,6 +457,8 @@ static inline int compute_score2(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
 		if (inet->inet_daddr != saddr)
 			return -1;
 		score += 4;
+	} else if (sk->sk_incoming_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) {
+		score++;
 	}
 
 	if (inet->inet_dport) {
@@ -470,10 +472,6 @@ static inline int compute_score2(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
 			return -1;
 		score += 4;
 	}
-
-	if (sk->sk_incoming_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
-		score++;
-
 	return score;
 }
 
diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
index 5d2c2afffe7b..0d87b1ded070 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
@@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ static inline int compute_score(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
 		if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&sk->sk_v6_daddr, saddr))
 			return -1;
 		score++;
+	} else if (sk->sk_incoming_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) {
+		score++;
 	}
 
 	if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if) {
@@ -197,10 +199,6 @@ static inline int compute_score(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
 			return -1;
 		score++;
 	}
-
-	if (sk->sk_incoming_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
-		score++;
-
 	return score;
 }
 
@@ -233,6 +231,8 @@ static inline int compute_score2(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
 		if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&sk->sk_v6_daddr, saddr))
 			return -1;
 		score++;
+	} else if (sk->sk_incoming_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) {
+		score++;
 	}
 
 	if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if) {
@@ -240,10 +240,6 @@ static inline int compute_score2(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
 			return -1;
 		score++;
 	}
-
-	if (sk->sk_incoming_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
-		score++;
-
 	return score;
 }
 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help