Thread (24 messages) flat view 24 messages, 7 authors, 2016-01-18

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] gianfar: Delete unnecessary variable initialisations in gfar_ethflow_to_filer_table()

From: SF Markus Elfring <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-15 11:35:00
Also in: kernel-janitors, lkml

quoted
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar_ethtool.c
@@ -768,12 +768,12 @@ static void ethflow_to_filer_rules (struct gfar_private *priv, u64 ethflow)
 static int gfar_ethflow_to_filer_table(struct gfar_private *priv, u64 ethflow,
 				       u64 class)
 {
-	unsigned int last_rule_idx = priv->cur_filer_idx;
+	unsigned int last_rule_idx;
This is a write only variable.  We can just remove it.
Can a static source code analysis tool like the software "http://smatch.sourceforge.net/"
detect that such a variable is not read by this function implementation so far?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar_ethtool.c?id=b75ec3af27bf011a760e2f44eb25a99b6fbb0fb3#n850

Does this place indicate an unwanted value assignment as a leftover,
or are there any other actions missing?

Regards,
Markus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help