-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller [mailto:<redacted>]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 3:21
To: <redacted>
Cc: Dexuan Cui <redacted>; <redacted>; <redacted>;
kadlec-K40Dz/62t/MgiyqX0sVFJYdd74u8MsAO@public.gmane.org; daniel-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org; daniel.wagner-98C5kh4wR6ohFhg+JK9F0w@public.gmane.org;
nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org; lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org; hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org;
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; netfilter-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org;
coreteam-Cap9r6Oaw4JrovVCs/uTlw@public.gmane.org; cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-
kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org; ninasc-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net, cgroup: cgroup_sk_updat_lock was missing
initializer
From: Tejun Heo <redacted>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:24:06 -0500
quoted
bd1060a1d671 ("sock, cgroup: add sock->sk_cgroup") added global
spinlock cgroup_sk_update_lock but erroneously skipped initializer
leading to uninitialized spinlock warning. Fix it by using
DEFINE_SPINLOCK().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <redacted>
Reported-by: Dexuan Cui <redacted>
Fixes: bd1060a1d671 ("sock, cgroup: add sock->sk_cgroup")
Applied, thanks.
Thanks! I can confirm it fixed the issue.
Thanks,
-- Dexuan