Re: [PATCH 0/3] ser_gigaset fixes

Hi Tilman,

On za, 2015-12-12 at 19:09 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:

Am 10.12.2015 um 12:31 schrieb Paul Bolle:

quoted

1/3 ran into objections and, I think, Alan Cox is working on an
alternative for it. Would you mind resending 2/3 and 3/3 as a two
patches series? Feel free to add
    Acked-by: Paul Bolle [off-list ref]

to both.

Alan's patch dated 09 Dec 2015 20:33:24 applies on top of 1/3 so I
reckon it should be kept.

Which apparently never hit my INBOX. If it had, we wouldn't have been
discussing my request to resend. Thanks for pointing me at that patch!

quoted

(The previous gigaset series, which you sent in July this year, was
picked up from netdev directly by David Miller. Unless people
actually
prefer these patches to also be signed-off by me, I'm perfectly fine
with that.)

I think as a maintainer you are supposed to sign off patches for the
code you maintain. My signed-off as recently retired ex-maintainer was
probably still good enough in July. I'm unsure whether it still is 
today.

So I'll jot you down as someone preferring that I sign off.

I'll take your series, and Alan's patch - which you just forwarded to me
in a separate message - and kick them around a bit more. Then I expect
to send everything to netdev by next Monday.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle