Hi Peter,
Am 10.12.2015 um 15:04 schrieb Peter Hurley:
quoted
quoted
quoted
--- a/drivers/isdn/gigaset/ser-gigaset.c
+++ b/drivers/isdn/gigaset/ser-gigaset.c
@@ -370,19 +370,23 @@ static void gigaset_freecshw(struct cardstate
*cs)
tasklet_kill(&cs->write_tasklet);
if (!cs->hw.ser)
return;
- dev_set_drvdata(&cs->hw.ser->dev.dev, NULL);
platform_device_unregister(&cs->hw.ser->dev);
- kfree(cs->hw.ser);
- cs->hw.ser = NULL;
}
static void gigaset_device_release(struct device *dev)
{
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+ struct cardstate *cs = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
/* adapted from platform_device_release() in
drivers/base/platform.c */
kfree(dev->platform_data);
kfree(pdev->resource);
+
+ if (!cs)
+ return;
+ dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
This is of marginal value and (I think) unnecessary; it implies
the core will use the device after release, which would trigger
many problems if true.
Agreed, but I'm just moving existing code here. Dropping the
dev_set_drvdata() call would be an unrelated change which should be done
in a separate patch if I understand the rules correctly.
Regards,
Tilman
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Nous, on a des fleurs et des bougies pour nous protéger.