Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] rhashtable: add function to replace an element

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:14:24AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:

That creates one more level of indirection. I don't see how add an
atomic replace operation adds any complexity to the rhashtable, none
of the semantics for rhashtable need to be changed.

OK after thinking about it a little bit more I think your approach
is safe and we won't need to play any more games to get this to
work.  So I'm fine with this patch.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt