On (11/02/15 14:57), Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
On (11/02/15 17:26), Nelson, Shannon wrote:
quoted
quoted
I assume you mean .1q
Yes, this is what I had in mind.
I dont think we're quite there yet, even without vlans.
Ok finally got all the .1q stuff verified (took a bit longer
than it should, because of some lab/administrative hassles in
getting the vlans adjusted at intermediate switches). But
the fix as I'd sent has been tested, and it is good for .1q.
The issues I was seeing with promisc were orthogonal to my fix,
or even to my platform - I understand those are being addressed
separately.
I'm probably too late for the merge window, and I dont know if
this fix qualifies as "critical" for net, so I'll re-target v5
for net-next, to be conservative.
--Sowmini