Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] bpf: add support for persistent maps/progs
From: Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-16 23:54:11
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2015-10-23 · Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] bpf: add support for persistent maps/progs · Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
- 2015-10-22 · Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] bpf: add support for persistent maps/progs · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
- 2015-10-22 · Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] bpf: add support for persistent maps/progs · Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
- 2015-10-21 · Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] bpf: add support for persistent maps/progs · Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
- 2015-10-21 · Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] bpf: add support for persistent maps/progs · Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] writes:
We can argue about api for 2nd, whether it's mount with fd=1234 string or else, but for the first mount style doesn't make sense.
Why does mount not make sense? It is exactly what you are looking for so why does it not make sense? Eric