Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs
From: Andy Lutomirski <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-05 21:16:46
Also in:
linux-api, lkml
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] wrote:
On 10/5/15 2:00 PM, Kees Cook wrote:quoted
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Alexei Starovoitov[off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
In order to let unprivileged users load and execute eBPF programs teach verifier to prevent pointer leaks. Verifier will prevent - any arithmetic on pointers (except R10+Imm which is used to compute stack addresses) - comparison of pointers - passing pointers to helper functions - indirectly passing pointers in stack to helper functions - returning pointer from bpf program - storing pointers into ctx or mapsDoes the arithmetic restriction include using a pointer as an index to a maps-based tail call? I'm still worried about pointer-based side-effects.the array maps that hold FDs (BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY and BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY) don't have lookup/update accessors from the program side, so programs cannot see or manipulate those pointers. For the former only bpf_tail_call() is allowed that takes integer index and jumps to it. And the latter map accessed with bpf_perf_event_read() that also takes index only (this helper is not available to socket filters anyway). Also bpf_tail_call() can only jump to the program of the same type. So I'm quite certain it's safe.
At some point there will be an unprivileged way to create a map, though, and we don't want to let pointers get poked into the map. Or am I misunderstanding? --Andy