Hi,
On 08/14/2015 03:36 AM, Adrien Schildknecht wrote:
Both loops of this function compare data from the 'chan' array and then
check if the index is valid.
The 2 conditions should be inverted to avoid an out-of-bounds access.
Was that found by a static analyzer or any other automated tool, or was
that the result of your very careful review?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Adrien Schildknecht <redacted>
---
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-parse.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-parse.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-parse.c
index 21302b6..acc3d18 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-parse.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-parse.c
@@ -713,12 +713,12 @@ int iwl_init_sband_channels(struct iwl_nvm_data *data,
struct ieee80211_channel *chan = &data->channels[0];
int n = 0, idx = 0;
- while (chan->band != band && idx < n_channels)
+ while (idx < n_channels && chan->band != band)
chan = &data->channels[++idx];
sband->channels = &data->channels[idx];
- while (chan->band == band && idx < n_channels) {
+ while (idx < n_channels && chan->band == band) {
chan = &data->channels[++idx];
n++;
}
Looks fine - I'll pick it up.