Re: [PATCH] veth: replace iflink by a dedicated symlink in sysfs
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2015-08-20 21:07:35
From: Nicolas Dichtel <redacted> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:31:11 +0200
Le 20/08/2015 13:53, Jiri Benc a écrit :quoted
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:33:14 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:quoted
Probably better to introduce veth netlink attribute then, something like IFLA_VETH_PEER and keeps IFLA_LINK_NETNSID.I'd prefer IFLA_PEER. More generic attribute will be helpful should we introduce an interface similar to veth in the future.sOk.quoted
Also, I'd not combine IFLA_LINK_NETNSID with IFLA_PEER. There might very well be an interface in the future that will need both IFLA_LINK and IFLA_PEER and this would just create a confusion. It may be unlikely but the attributes are cheap and it doesn't make sense to design uAPI in a way that might bring problems in the future.Ok, but then this IFLA_PEER can include the ifindex and the nsid. No need to have two new attributes.quoted
quoted
I also don't know what is the best way to handle this. veth advertises its peer via IFLA_LINK since 4.1, so it's too late to change it for this release.Apparently we need to pick our poison. Either way, we break something.Sure. I would prefer to have the same mechanism in all version, but I can live with the other solution. David, any thoughts about this?
You can't break the 4.1 semantics, it's in a released kernel and people _ARE_ using it.