On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 08:44:08 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
While the documentation doesn't say exactly what kind of relationship
iflink should represent, until a45253, only lower devices were
advertised this way. While veth cannot have a lower device, using iflink
to advertise the peer may create infinite loops in programs using iflink
to discover device topology.
Instead of advertising the peer link with iflink, a symbolic link "peer"
is added to each peer.
By removing veth_get_iflink, you're also stopping IFLA_LINK being
advertised in netlink messages, which consequently makes impossible to
reliably match veth peers across name spaces again. This would be a
huge step backwards.
Jiri
--
Jiri Benc