Re: [PATCH] net: mdio-gpio: Allow for unspecified bus id
From: Bert Vermeulen <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-08 16:01:33
Also in:
lkml
On 05/08/2015 05:48 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 04:18:49PM +0200, Bert Vermeulen wrote:quoted
When the bus id was supplied via a struct platform_device, the driver wasn't handling -1 to mean an unspecified id of the only instance of this driver, as the platform spec requires. Signed-off-by: Bert Vermeulen <redacted> --- drivers/net/phy/mdio-gpio.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio-gpio.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-gpio.c index f5cddf5..7bd90db 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio-gpio.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-gpio.c@@ -165,7 +165,10 @@ static struct mii_bus *mdio_gpio_bus_init(struct device *dev, if (!new_bus->irq[i]) new_bus->irq[i] = PHY_POLL; - snprintf(new_bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "gpio-%x", bus_id); + if (bus_id != -1) + snprintf(new_bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "gpio-%x", bus_id); + else + strncpy(new_bus->id, "gpio", MII_BUS_ID_SIZE);Hi Bert What happens if there are multiple platform_device's with -1? You should probably be using use idr_alloc().
It's an instance id per driver, not globally, and -1 specifically means it's the only instance. From Documentation/driver-model/platform.txt:
These are concatenated, so name/id "serial"/0 indicates bus_id "serial.0", and "serial/3" indicates bus_id "serial.3"; both would use the platform_driver named "serial". While "my_rtc"/-1 would be bus_id "my_rtc" (no instance id) and use the platform_driver called "my_rtc".
-- Bert Vermeulen bert@biot.com email/xmpp