On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 05:19 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 16:38 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
Another thing that's fairly common is an skb_put followed by
a memcpy or memset.
Adding a couple of functions for those like:
void *skb_put_memcpy(struct sk_buff *skb, void *from, size_t size);
void *skb_put_memset(struct sk_buff *skb, int c, size_t size);
would reduce code size and improve performance a little.
[]
We understand the code as is, with regular memcpy() and memset()
These functions are fine. They were fine 20 years ago, nothing changed.
Prefer speed and size improvements over stasis.
alloc+memset works, zalloc exists.
Using these functions would reduce a non-modular defconfig
x86-64 net/built-in.o by a couple kb.
Probably double that for a kernel.
These functions would be used in the packet processing path
for wireless too.