Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] can: fix multiple delivery of a single CAN frame for overlapping CAN filters
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2015-03-30 10:36:56
Also in:
linux-can
On 03/30/2015 12:29 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
On 30.03.2015 11:50, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:quoted
quoted
can_err_mask_t err_mask; + struct sk_buff __percpu **uniq_skb; + ktime_t __percpu *uniq_tstamp;What about creating a struct to hold the ktime_t and the skb? BTW: the pointer to the skb can be marked as const.Don't think so. The pointer points to some allocated memory.
Yes, but the allocated memory points to a skb which is not modified, so it's a: struct sk_buff __percpu * const *uniq_skb; Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 819 bytes