Thread (51 messages) 51 messages, 11 authors, 2015-03-30

Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v2] switchdev: bridge: drop hardware forwarded packets

From: roopa <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-24 17:45:04

On 3/24/15, 9:01 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 03:29:21PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
index aab962c..0f7217f7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
@@ -3931,15 +3931,28 @@ unmap_frag:
        return -EMSGSIZE;
}

+static bool rocker_port_dev_check(struct net_device *dev);
+
static netdev_tx_t rocker_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
net_device *dev)
{
        struct rocker_port *rocker_port = netdev_priv(dev);
        struct rocker *rocker = rocker_port->rocker;
        struct rocker_desc_info *desc_info;
        struct rocker_tlv *frags;
+       struct net_device *in_dev;
        int i;
        int err;

+       if (rocker_port_is_bridged(rocker_port)) {
+               rcu_read_lock();
+               in_dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(dev_net(dev), skb->skb_iif);
Hmm, you iterate over all ports for every xmit call :/
Would be nicer if skb_iif would be netdev poiter. Not sure it is doable.
It may be easier (and faster) to loop through all rocker ports and try to find
one with the same ifindex. Then the dev_check call would not be necessary.
This is still overhead for every packet on the switches we support. The 
number of ports can go close to 128
(40G ports can be broken into 4x10G ports).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help