Thread (44 messages) flat view 44 messages, 5 authors, 2015-03-23

Re: [v2 PATCH 3/10] rhashtable: Allow hashfn to be unset

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2015-03-22 12:04:37

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:55:05AM +0000, Thomas Graf wrote:
On 03/22/15 at 07:04pm, Herbert Xu wrote:
quoted
@@ -134,6 +136,7 @@ struct rhashtable {
 	struct bucket_table __rcu	*tbl;
 	atomic_t			nelems;
 	bool                            being_destroyed;
+	unsigned int			key_len;
Why is this needed? It looks like you're always initializing this
with ht->p.key_len
It's ht->p.key_len/4 if we use jhash2.
 
quoted
+	if (!__builtin_constant_p(params.key_len))
+		hash = ht->p.hashfn(key, ht->key_len, tbl->hash_rnd);
I don't understand this. It looks like you only consider
params->key_len if it's constant.
If params->key_len is not constant, then params == ht->p.
quoted
+	else if (params.key_len) {
+		unsigned key_len = params.key_len;
+
+		if (params.hashfn)
+			hash = params.hashfn(key, key_len, tbl->hash_rnd);
+		else if (key_len & (sizeof(u32) - 1))
+			hash = jhash(key, key_len, tbl->hash_rnd);
+		else
+			hash = jhash2(key, key_len / sizeof(u32),
+				      tbl->hash_rnd);
+	} else {
+		unsigned key_len = ht->p.key_len;
+
+		if (params.hashfn)
+			hash = params.hashfn(key, key_len, tbl->hash_rnd);
+		else
+			hash = jhash(key, key_len, tbl->hash_rnd);
Why don't we opt-in to jhash2 in this case?
Because if key_len == 0 it means that key_len is not known at
compile-time.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help