Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2015-03-10

Re: If bridge have no sub-interfaces, it's status may be still with 'RUNNING'

flat view

From: yzhu1 <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-25 02:57:05

Hi, Stephen && David

Any update?

Zhu Yanjun

On 02/18/2015 12:14 AM, Zhu, Yanjun wrote:
Hi, all

We should make it compatible. So I made a patch to turn on carrier on this bridge interface when the last sub interface is removed.

Hi, David

Please make tests with this latest patch. Thanks a lot.

Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
________________________________________
From: Stephen Hemminger [stephen@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 8:51 AM
To: David Ahern
Cc: Zhu, Yanjun; netdev; Wu, Kuaikuai; Tao, Yue
Subject: Re: If bridge have no sub-interfaces, it's status may be still with 'RUNNING'

Originally bridge code would start with carrier off,
but there were users using bridge as a form of dummy device
and this broke them. Therefore it was decided (like 5 yrs ago),
that bridge should start with carrier on.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help