Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] can: kvaser_usb: Consolidate and unify state change handling
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-21 16:13:56
Also in:
linux-can, lkml
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:36:47 -0500, "Ahmed S. Darwish" [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:00:15PM +0000, Andri Yngvason wrote:quoted
Quoting Ahmed S. Darwish (2015-01-21 14:43:23)quoted
Hi!...quoted
quoted
<-- Unplug the cable --> (000.009106) can0 20000080 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 ERRORFRAME bus-error error-counter-tx-rx{{8}{0}} (000.001872) can0 20000080 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00
For a bus-errors I would also expcect some more information in the data[2..3] fields. But these are always zero.
quoted
quoted
ERRORFRAME bus-error error-counter-tx-rx{{16}{0}}[...]quoted
error-counter-tx-rx{{80}{0}} (000.001910) can0 20000080 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 58 00 ERRORFRAME bus-error error-counter-tx-rx{{88}{0}} (000.001753) can0 20000084 [8] 00 08 00 00 00 00 60 00 ERRORFRAME controller-problem{tx-error-warning}Good.quoted
bus-error error-counter-tx-rx{{96}{0}}Nice.quoted
quoted
(000.001720) can0 20000080 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 68 00 ERRORFRAME bus-error error-counter-tx-rx{{104}{0}} (000.001876) can0 20000080 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 70 00 ERRORFRAME bus-error error-counter-tx-rx{{112}{0}} (000.001749) can0 20000080 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 78 00 ERRORFRAME bus-error error-counter-tx-rx{{120}{0}} (000.001771) can0 20000084 [8] 00 20 00 00 00 00 80 00 ERRORFRAME controller-problem{tx-error-passive}Also good.quoted
bus-error error-counter-tx-rx{{128}{0}}Also nice :-)quoted
quoted
(000.001868) can0 20000080 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 00 ERRORFRAME bus-error error-counter-tx-rx{{128}{0}} (000.001982) can0 20000080 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 00 ERRORFRAME bus-error error-counter-tx-rx{{128}{0}} (( Then a continous flood, exactly similar to the above packet, appears. Unfortunately this flooding is a firmware problem. )) <-- Replug the cable, after a good amount of time -->Where are the reverse state transitions?quoted
Hmmm... [ ... ]quoted
Reverse state transitions are missing from the logs. See comments
above.
quoted
When the device is on the _receiving_ end, and I unplug the CAN cable
after
introducing some noise to the level of reaching WARNING or PASSIVE, I receive a BUS_ERROR event with the rxerr count reset back to 0 or 1. In that case, the driver correctly transitions back the state to
ERROR_ACTIVE
and candump produces something similar to:
(000.000362) can0 2000008C [8] 00 40 40 00 00 00 00 01
ERRORFRAME
controller-problem{}
protocol-violation{{back-to-error-active}{}}
bus-error
error-counter-tx-rx{{0}{1}}
which is, AFAIK, the correct behaviour from the driver side.
Meanwhile, when the device is on the _sending_ end and I re-plug the CAN
cable again. Sometimes I receive events with txerr reset to 0 or 1, and
the driver correctly reverts back to ERROR_ACTIVE in that case. But on
another times like the quoted case above, I don't receive any events
resetting txerr back -- only data packets on the bus.Well, the firmware seems to report *only* bus-errors via CMD_CAN_ERROR_EVENT messages, also carrying the new state, but no CMD_CHIP_STATE_EVENT just for the state changes.
So, What can the driver do given the above?
Little if the notification does not come. Wolfgang.