Thread (19 messages) flat view 19 messages, 6 authors, 2014-11-24

Re: [PATCH net-net 0/4] Increase the limit of tuntap queues

From: Pankaj Gupta <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-24 14:28:45
Also in: lkml

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:23:21PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 22:30:32 +0200
quoted
qemu runs in the host, but it's unpriveledged: it gets
passed tun FDs by a priveledged daemon, and it only
has the rights to some operations,
in particular to attach and detach queues.

The assumption always was that this operation is safe
and can't make kernel run out of resources.
This creates a rather rediculous situation in my opinion.

Configuring a network device is a privileged operation, the daemon
should be setting this thing up.

In no other context would we have to worry about something like this.
Right.  Jason corrected me.  I got it wrong:
what qemu does is TUNSETQUEUE and that needs to get a queue
that's already initialized by the daemon.

To create new queues daemon calls TUNSETIFF,
and that already can be used to create new devices,
so it's a priveledged operation.

This means it's safe to just drop the restriction,
exactly as you suggested originally.
I will drop patch2 to add sysctl entry and and will send a v2 with other 
patches.

Thanks,
Pankaj
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help