Thread (19 messages) flat view 19 messages, 6 authors, 2014-11-24

Re: [PATCH net-net 0/4] Increase the limit of tuntap queues

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2014-11-23 10:46:48
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:44:27PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:16:28PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Pankaj Gupta <redacted>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:52:54 +0530
quoted
- Accept maximum number of queues as sysctl param so that any user space 
  application like libvirt can use this value to limit number of queues. Also
  Administrators can specify maximum number of queues by updating this sysctl
  entry.
This is the only part I don't like.

Just let whoever has privileges to configure the tun device shoot
themselves in the foot if they want to by configuring "too many"
queues.

If the virtual entity runs itself out of resources by doing something
stupid, it's purely their problem.
Well it will run host out of kernel, no?

To clarify:

At the moment attaching/detaching queues is an unpriveledged operation.

Shouldn't we worry that an application can cause large
allocations, and provide a way to limit these?

David, could you comment on this please?
-- 
MST
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help