Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add lightweight memory barriers fast_rmb() and fast_wmb()
From: Alexander Duyck <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-18 15:45:43
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
From: Alexander Duyck <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-18 15:45:43
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On 11/18/2014 01:57 AM, David Laight wrote:
From: Alexander Duyckquoted
These patches introduce two new primitives for synchronizing cache-enabled memory writes and reads. These two new primitives are: fast_rmb() fast_wmb()Not sure I like the names. If the aim is to sync data into the local cache so that hardware that is doing cache-snooping accesses sees the data then maybe local_rmb() and local_wmb()
Yeah, that is the general consensus. I am planning to change them to coherent_rmb() and coherent_wmb().
IIRC read_barrier_depends() is a nop on everything except alpha. Maybe add the default if it isn't defined by the MD file? David
From my patch the only two I saw define it were alpha and blackfin. It is already defined in asm-generic, the rest is just clean-up since I suspect some of the arch tree barrier.h calls just borrowed from asm-generic without sorting out what became redundancies. Thanks, Alex