On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:23:27AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:

On 10/25/14 07:01, Andrew Lunn wrote:

quoted

quoted

Here is another naming option:

em1dsa0-virtual-0

I prefer this over isa.

However, i think there should be some sort of separator between the
network device name and dsa.

Considering that network devices can be renamed, do we want it to be
included in the sensor name at all?

Well, we need something which identifies the "DSA collection". In
that, you could have two or more collections, connected to different
network devices.

I once came across a PCI board with two Intel ethernet chipsets and
two 10 port Marvell switches. Each switch had one host cpu port, 3
ports interconnected to the other switch, and 6 going to the back
panel.  You would want to describe that as two separate DSA entities,
not one DSA with two switches. So the name needs something to indicate
the DSA collection.

	Andrew