From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:50:06 +0200
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:34 PM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:39:41 +0200
quoted
drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_sgmac.c: In function ‘xgene_enet_ecc_init’:
drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_sgmac.c:126: warning: ‘data’ may be used uninitialized in this function
Depending on the arbitrary value on the stack, the loop may terminate
too early, and cause a bogus -ENODEV failure.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
---
v2: Rewrite the loop instead of pre-initializing data.
I hate to be a pest, but like the other patch of your's I think
a do { } while() works best here because the intent is clearly
to run the loop at least once, right?
I wanted to avoid checking for "data != ~0U" twice: once to abort the loop,
and once to check if a timeout happened.
Hmmm:
do {
usleep_range(...);
data = ...();
if (data == ~0)
return 0;
} while (++i < 10);
netdev_err(...);
return -ENODEV;
Why would you have to check data twice?