Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 8 authors, 2014-09-29

Re: [net-next PATCH 1/1 V4] qdisc: bulk dequeue support for qdiscs with TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Date: 2014-09-25 12:49:00

On 09/25/14 04:25, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:13:57 -0400
I've done measurements with netperf-wrapper:
  http://netoptimizer.blogspot.dk/2014/09/mini-tutorial-for-netperf-wrapper-setup.html

I have already previously posted my measurements here:
  http://people.netfilter.org/hawk/qdisc/
  http://people.netfilter.org/hawk/qdisc/measure01/
  http://people.netfilter.org/hawk/qdisc/experiment01/
Theres a lot of data there to digest; all good looking.
I will try to pay attention to detail and get back to you.
What you have on those urls is fit for a paper, but what someone
like me (with ADD) needs is a summary somewhere maybe in the commit
logs.
Please, see my previous mail where I described each graph.
Is this patch 0?
I think a simple statement in the commit log that no cats
were harmed ^W^W^W performance was affected. A paragraph
at most but if you want to do more, DaveM actually has no
problems if you write the details of a novel in patch 0.

cheers,
jamal
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help