Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 5 authors, 2014-09-08

Re: [PATCH 3/3] virtio_ring: unify direct/indirect code paths.

From: Rusty Russell <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-05 02:55:40
Also in: virtualization
Subsystem: the rest, virtio core · Maintainers: Linus Torvalds, "Michael S. Tsirkin", Jason Wang

Andy Lutomirski [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Rusty Russell [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
virtqueue_add() populates the virtqueue descriptor table from the sgs
given.  If it uses an indirect descriptor table, then it puts a single
descriptor in the descriptor table pointing to the kmalloc'ed indirect
table where the sg is populated.

Previously vring_add_indirect() did the allocation and the simple
linear layout.  We replace that with alloc_indirect() which allocates
the indirect table then chains it like the normal descriptor table so
we can reuse the core logic.
quoted
+       if (vq->indirect && total_sg > 1 && vq->vq.num_free)
+               desc = alloc_indirect(total_sg, gfp);
+       else
+               desc = NULL;
+
+       if (desc) {
+               /* Use a single buffer which doesn't continue */
+               vq->vring.desc[head].flags = VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT;
+               vq->vring.desc[head].addr = virt_to_phys(desc);
+               /* avoid kmemleak false positive (hidden by virt_to_phys) */
+               kmemleak_ignore(desc);
+               vq->vring.desc[head].len = total_sg * sizeof(struct vring_desc);
+
+               /* Set up rest to use this indirect table. */
+               i = 0;
+               total_sg = 1;
This is a little too magical for me.  Would it make sense to add a new
variable for this (total_root_descs or something)?
Agreed, it's a little hacky.

Here's the diff (I actually merged this into the patch, but no point
re-xmitting):
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index a4ebbffac141..6d2b5310c991 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
 	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
 	struct scatterlist *sg;
 	struct vring_desc *desc;
-	unsigned int i, n, avail, uninitialized_var(prev);
+	unsigned int i, n, avail, descs_used, uninitialized_var(prev);
 	int head;
 	bool indirect;
 
@@ -179,17 +179,18 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
 
 		/* Set up rest to use this indirect table. */
 		i = 0;
-		total_sg = 1;
+		descs_used = 1;
 		indirect = true;
 	} else {
 		desc = vq->vring.desc;
 		i = head;
+		descs_used = total_sg;
 		indirect = false;
 	}
 
-	if (vq->vq.num_free < total_sg) {
+	if (vq->vq.num_free < descs_used) {
 		pr_debug("Can't add buf len %i - avail = %i\n",
-			 total_sg, vq->vq.num_free);
+			 descs_used, vq->vq.num_free);
 		/* FIXME: for historical reasons, we force a notify here if
 		 * there are outgoing parts to the buffer.  Presumably the
 		 * host should service the ring ASAP. */
@@ -200,7 +201,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
 	}
 
 	/* We're about to use some buffers from the free list. */
-	vq->vq.num_free -= total_sg;
+	vq->vq.num_free -= descs_used;
 
 	for (n = 0; n < out_sgs; n++) {
 		for (sg = sgs[n]; sg; sg = sg_next(sg)) {
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help