Re: [patch net-next RFC 10/12] openvswitch: add support for datapath hardware offload
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-26 15:12:15
On 08/26/14 11:01, Scott Feldman wrote:
I don’t see it that way. I believe sw_flow can be the intermediary representation to span flow-based and non-flow-based HW, and from flow-based world and traditional l2/l3 world.
Is there more magic to this than what Thomas just presented in this thread? cheers, jamal