Re: [PATCH 00/17] Misc MIPS/BPF fixes for 3.16

[PATCH 00/17] Misc MIPS/BPF fixes for 3.16 · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
[PATCH 04/17] MIPS: bpf: Use the LO register to get division's quotient · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
[PATCH 05/17] MIPS: bpf: Return error code if the offset is a negative number · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
Re: [PATCH 05/17] MIPS: bpf: Return error code if the offset is a negative number · Alexei Starovoitov <hidden> · 2014-06-23
Re: [PATCH 05/17] MIPS: bpf: Return error code if the offset is a negative number · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-25
[PATCH 06/17] MIPS: bpf: Use 'andi' instead of 'and' for the VLAN cases · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
[PATCH 07/17] MIPS: bpf: Add SEEN_SKB to flags when looking for the PKT_TYPE · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
[PATCH 08/17] MIPS: bpf: Fix branch conditional for BPF_J{GT/GE} cases · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
[PATCH 09/17] MIPS: bpf: Use correct mask for VLAN_TAG case · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
[PATCH 10/17] MIPS: bpf: Fix return values for VLAN_TAG_PRESENT case · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
[PATCH 11/17] MIPS: bpf: Use pr_debug instead of pr_warn for unhandled opcodes · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
[PATCH 12/17] MIPS: bpf: Fix is_range() semantics · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
[PATCH 13/17] MIPS: bpf: Drop update_on_xread and always initialize the X register · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
[PATCH 14/17] MIPS: bpf: Prevent kernel fall over for >=32bit shifts · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
RE: [PATCH 14/17] MIPS: bpf: Prevent kernel fall over for >=32bit shifts · David Laight <hidden> · 2014-06-23
Re: [PATCH 14/17] MIPS: bpf: Prevent kernel fall over for >=32bit shifts · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
RE: [PATCH 14/17] MIPS: bpf: Prevent kernel fall over for >=32bit shifts · David Laight <hidden> · 2014-06-23
Re: [PATCH 14/17] MIPS: bpf: Prevent kernel fall over for >=32bit shifts · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
[PATCH v2 14/17] MIPS: bpf: Prevent kernel fall over for >=32bit shifts · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-25
[PATCH 15/17] MIPS: bpf: Fix PKT_TYPE case for big-endian cores · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
[PATCH 16/17] MIPS: bpf: Use 32 or 64-bit load instruction to load an address to register · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
Re: [PATCH 16/17] MIPS: bpf: Use 32 or 64-bit load instruction to load an address to register · Paul Burton <hidden> · 2014-06-23
Re: [PATCH 16/17] MIPS: bpf: Use 32 or 64-bit load instruction to load an address to register · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-25
[PATCH v2 16/17] MIPS: bpf: Use 32 or 64-bit load instruction to load an address to register · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-25
Re: [PATCH v2 16/17] MIPS: bpf: Use 32 or 64-bit load instruction to load an address to register · Alexei Starovoitov <hidden> · 2014-06-25
[PATCH 17/17] MIPS: bpf: Fix stack space allocation for BPF memwords on MIPS64 · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-23
Re: [PATCH 00/17] Misc MIPS/BPF fixes for 3.16 · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2014-06-23
Re: [PATCH 00/17] Misc MIPS/BPF fixes for 3.16 · Markos Chandras <hidden> · 2014-06-25

From: Markos Chandras <hidden>
Date: 2014-06-25 08:12:14
Also in: linux-mips

On 06/23/2014 08:49 PM, David Miller wrote:

From: Markos Chandras <redacted>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:38:43 +0100

quoted

Here are some fixes for MIPS/BPF for 3.16. These fixes make
the bpf testsuite *almost* happy with only 2 tests (LD_IND_LL,
LD_IND_NET) failing at the moment. Since fixing the remaining tests
is not so trivial, it would be nice to have these fixes in 3.16 for now.

The patches are based on the upstream-sfr/mips-for-linux-next tree
because they depend on https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/7099/

You did not CC: netdev on patches 1, 2, and 3.  Please do not do this,
people on this list will want to review the series as a whole.

Apologies David. Patches 1,2,3 have nothing to do with bpf-jit and they
only fix/add MIPS micro-assembler instructions so I didn't though
netdev@ actually cared about that. I will be more careful in the future.

-- 
markos

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help