From: Or Gerlitz <hidden> Date: 2014-06-11 09:26:19
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Pravin B Shelar [off-list ref] wrote:
Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <redacted>
Hi Pravin,
Can you please provide a non-empty change log for this patch... I
understand the patch
addresses some openvswitch use case where offloads are currently
non-coming into play and
you want to support that, right?
OK, I guess this commit is similar in spirit to 82d8189 "veth: extend
features to support tunneling"
So in that respect, don't you need to set also dev->hw_enc_features
for the NETIF_F_GSO_YYY to come into play?
OK, I guess this commit is similar in spirit to 82d8189 "veth: extend
features to support tunneling"
So in that respect, don't you need to set also dev->hw_enc_features
for the NETIF_F_GSO_YYY to come into play?
From: Or Gerlitz <hidden> Date: 2014-06-30 21:53:26
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Pravin B Shelar [off-list ref] wrote:
Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <redacted>
Hi Pravin, ping... this addresses a real life use case where offloads
didn't come into play, right? can you respin the patch with non-empty
change-log so people can review/ack it? --> and we'll have upstream
support for that case.
Or.
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Or Gerlitz [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Pravin B Shelar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <redacted>
Hi Pravin, ping... this addresses a real life use case where offloads
didn't come into play, right? can you respin the patch with non-empty
change-log so people can review/ack it? --> and we'll have upstream
support for that case.
This patch is blocked by double encap issue. You can read mail thread
on first patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=140236173911474&w=2
Tom is going to fix GSO for packets with multiple encapsulations.
After that it would be safe to enable tunnel offloading features for
OVS.
Thanks,
Pravin.
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Tom Herbert <hidden> Date: 2014-07-01 00:32:52
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Pravin Shelar [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Or Gerlitz [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Pravin B Shelar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <redacted>
Hi Pravin, ping... this addresses a real life use case where offloads
didn't come into play, right? can you respin the patch with non-empty
change-log so people can review/ack it? --> and we'll have upstream
support for that case.
This patch is blocked by double encap issue. You can read mail thread
on first patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=140236173911474&w=2
Tom is going to fix GSO for packets with multiple encapsulations.
After that it would be safe to enable tunnel offloading features for
OVS.
I have some working patches for that but would like to get checksum
changes finished first. The first patch is reasonable to keep things
moving and should be okay to undo.
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html