From: Sergei Shtylyov <redacted>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 17:52:07 +0400

Hello.

On 29-03-2014 1:18, David Miller wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

I thought it was against the net next tree, given the number of
patches that are currently being applied to the sh_eth driver.

quoted

quoted

quoted

Fair enough, applied to net-next, thanks!

quoted

quoted

    It probably makes sense to queue this for the stable kernels as well.

quoted

Sorry, that's not how this works.

quoted

If it's good enough for -stable, meaning that users are activly
hitting
the problem and it's a serious bug, then it's good enough for 'net'
and should have been submitted against 'net'.

   I thought that at this point only regression fixes are good for 'net'.
Although, this can be considered a regression too -- since addition of
runtime PM support back in 2009.

-stable has more stringent requirements for inclusion than 'net',
therefore it is never valid for something to go -stable which is
not in 'net'.