Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init | netdev | Ratatoskr

[PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init · Ben Dooks <hidden> · 2014-03-21
Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2014-03-21
Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init · Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> · 2014-03-21
Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2014-03-28
Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init · Ben Dooks <hidden> · 2014-03-28
Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2014-03-28
Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init · Sergei Shtylyov <hidden> · 2014-03-28
Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2014-03-28
Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init · Sergei Shtylyov <hidden> · 2014-03-29
Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2014-03-29

Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init

From: Sergei Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-28 20:10:16
Also in: linux-sh

Hello.

On 03/28/2014 11:00 PM, David Miller wrote:

quoted

I thought it was against the net next tree, given the number of
patches that are currently being applied to the sh_eth driver.

Fair enough, applied to net-next, thanks!

    It probably makes sense to queue this for the stable kernels as well.

WBR, Sergei