From: Sergei Shtylyov <redacted>
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 01:03:18 +0300

Hello.

On 12/31/2013 11:31 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:

quoted

From: Zhi Yong Wu <redacted>

quoted

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <redacted>
---
  include/net/sock.h |    4 ++++
  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

quoted

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 8ee90ad..bd716b6 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h

@@ -846,12 +846,16 @@ static inline void

sock_rps_reset_flow_hash(__u32 hash)

  static inline void sock_rps_record_flow(const struct sock *sk)
  {
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
  	sock_rps_record_flow_hash(sk->sk_rxhash);
+#endif
  }

  static inline void sock_rps_reset_flow(const struct sock *sk)
  {
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
  	sock_rps_reset_flow_hash(sk->sk_rxhash);
+#endif
  }

   A lot better style would be:

Sorry, I meant to say, this is consistent with how the other functions
dependent upon RPS are handled.