On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 11:43:04PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 05:48:05PM -0700, Jon Mason wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:49:10PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <redacted>
---
 drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
index de2062c..eccd5e5 100644
--- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c

@@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ static int ntb_setup_msix(struct ntb_device *ndev)
 		/* On SNB, the link interrupt is always tied to 4th vector.  If
 		 * we can't get all 4, then we can't use MSI-X.
 		 */
-		if (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW) {
+		if ((rc < SNB_MSIX_CNT) && (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW)) {

Nack, this check is unnecessary.

If SNB can do more than SNB_MSIX_CNT MSI-Xs then this check is needed
to enable less than maximum MSI-Xs in case the maximum was not allocated.
Otherwise SNB will fallback to single MSI instead of multiple MSI-Xs.

Per the comment in the code snippet above, "If we can't get all 4,
then we can't use MSI-X".  There is already a check to see if more
than 4 were acquired.  So it's not possible to hit this.  Even if it
was, don't use SNB_MSIX_CNT here (limits.msix_cnt is the preferred
variable).  Also, the "()" are unnecessary.

Thanks,
Jon

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com