[PATCH net 4/5] sfc: Clean up validation of datapath capabilities
From: Ben Hutchings <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-17 00:13:07
Subsystem:
networking drivers, sfc network driver, the rest · Maintainers:
Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Edward Cree, Linus Torvalds
Rename efx_ef10_init_capabilities() to the more specific efx_ef10_init_datapath_caps(). Stop accepting short responses to MC_CMD_GET_CAPABILITIES; we don't need to support pre-production firmware. Move the check for RX prefix support from efx_ef10_probe() into efx_ef10_init_datapath_caps() and use consistent error messages for missing TSO support and missing RX prefix support. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <redacted> --- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
index 80a6eea..a4956b8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static unsigned int efx_ef10_mem_map_size(struct efx_nic *efx) return resource_size(&efx->pci_dev->resource[EFX_MEM_BAR]); } -static int efx_ef10_init_capabilities(struct efx_nic *efx) +static int efx_ef10_init_datapath_caps(struct efx_nic *efx) { MCDI_DECLARE_BUF(outbuf, MC_CMD_GET_CAPABILITIES_OUT_LEN); struct efx_ef10_nic_data *nic_data = efx->nic_data;
@@ -107,16 +107,27 @@ static int efx_ef10_init_capabilities(struct efx_nic *efx) outbuf, sizeof(outbuf), &outlen); if (rc) return rc; + if (outlen < sizeof(outbuf)) { + netif_err(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, + "unable to read datapath firmware capabilities\n"); + return -EIO; + } - if (outlen >= sizeof(outbuf)) { - nic_data->datapath_caps = - MCDI_DWORD(outbuf, GET_CAPABILITIES_OUT_FLAGS1); - if (!(nic_data->datapath_caps & - (1 << MC_CMD_GET_CAPABILITIES_OUT_TX_TSO_LBN))) { - netif_err(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, - "Capabilities don't indicate TSO support.\n"); - return -ENODEV; - } + nic_data->datapath_caps = + MCDI_DWORD(outbuf, GET_CAPABILITIES_OUT_FLAGS1); + + if (!(nic_data->datapath_caps & + (1 << MC_CMD_GET_CAPABILITIES_OUT_TX_TSO_LBN))) { + netif_err(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, + "current firmware does not support TSO\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } + + if (!(nic_data->datapath_caps & + (1 << MC_CMD_GET_CAPABILITIES_OUT_RX_PREFIX_LEN_14_LBN))) { + netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, + "current firmware does not support an RX prefix\n"); + return -ENODEV; } return 0;
@@ -217,21 +228,13 @@ static int efx_ef10_probe(struct efx_nic *efx) if (rc) goto fail3; - rc = efx_ef10_init_capabilities(efx); + rc = efx_ef10_init_datapath_caps(efx); if (rc < 0) goto fail3; efx->rx_packet_len_offset = ES_DZ_RX_PREFIX_PKTLEN_OFST - ES_DZ_RX_PREFIX_SIZE; - if (!(nic_data->datapath_caps & - (1 << MC_CMD_GET_CAPABILITIES_OUT_RX_PREFIX_LEN_14_LBN))) { - netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, - "current firmware does not support an RX prefix\n"); - rc = -ENODEV; - goto fail3; - } - rc = efx_mcdi_port_get_number(efx); if (rc < 0) goto fail3;
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.