RE: [patch net-next v6 4/4] igb/igbvf: implement ndo_get_phys_port_id
From: Brown, Aaron F <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-28 02:26:31
Sorry, I was out sick towards the end of last week and playing catch up for the last few days... Info inline.
From: Jiri Pirko [mailto:jiri@resnulli.us] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 6:10 AM To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T Cc: Brown, Aaron F; netdev@vger.kernel.org; davem@davemloft.net; stephen@networkplumber.org; Narendra_K@Dell.com; bhutchings@solarflare.com; or.gerlitz@gmail.com; Wyborny, Carolyn; Rose, Gregory V; vyasevic@redhat.com; amwang@redhat.com; johannes@sipsolutions.net Subject: Re: [patch net-next v6 4/4] igb/igbvf: implement ndo_get_phys_port_id Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:39:10PM CEST, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 18:16 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:quoted
igb driver generated random number which will identify physical port. This id is available via ndo_get_phys_port_id directly on igb netdev. Also, id is passed to igbvf using mailbox. After that, it is available via ndo_get_phys_port_id on igbvf netdev as well. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_mbx.h | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h | 3 +++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/igbvf.h | 4 ++++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/mbx.h | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/vf.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/vf.h | 1 + 8 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)Jiri- Validation ran into a couple of issues with this patch. Here is what Aaron found when testing this patch...Interesting. So since igbvf_refresh_ppid() is called from igbvf_reset() and igbvf_probe(), I believed that is enough. Looks like perm_addr getting works in similar way. Can you please check if perm_addr is set correctly in the same time reading phys_port_id gives -EOPNOTSUPP?
By perm_addr do you mean the MAC Address of the vf? Yes, it is set up (and I can view it vi ip link or sysconfig) when I see the op not supported message (after I fi vfs via sysfs, before bringing the vf interface up or reloading igbvf.)
quoted
Aaron Brown wrote: I think I have to fail this, it seems to have an issue with initialization. When I first create a vf via sysfs the pys_port_id file is created along with the other sysfs files for the vf, however an attempt to cat out the value returns " Operation not supported". At this point the vf is still down, if I bring it up (or simply unload / reload the igbvf driver) I can then cat the file successfully and the vf interface phys_port_id matches the phys_port_id of the pf. This is testing from bare metal, a console session showing this behavior follows: u1304:[0]/sys> find . -iname phys_port_id ./devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:00.0/net/eth0/phys_port_id ./devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:00.1/net/eth1/phys_port_id ./devices/virtual/net/sit0/phys_port_id ./devices/virtual/net/lo/phys_port_id u1304:[0]/sys> cat devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:00.0/net/eth0/phys_port_id 5ece9fbd9cd51546982e15c1f2c11e25 u1304:[0]/sys> So far so good, now make a few vfs and check for new phys_port_id sysfsfiles.quoted
u1304:[0]/sys> find . -iname sriov_numvfs ./devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:00.0/sriov_numvfs ./devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:00.1/sriov_numvfs u1304:[0]/sys> echo 2 >devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:00.0/sriov_numvfsquoted
u1304:[0]/sys> find . -iname phys_port_id./devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:00.0/net/eth0/phys_port_idquoted
./devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:00.1/net/eth1/phys_port_id ./devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:10.0/net/eth2/phys_port_id ./devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:10.2/net/eth3/phys_port_id ./devices/virtual/net/sit0/phys_port_id ./devices/virtual/net/lo/phys_port_id u1304:[0]/sys> The first vf is eth2, attempt to cat out it's phys_port_id u1304:[0]/sys> cat ./devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:10.0/net/eth2/phys_port_id cat: ./devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:10.0/net/eth2/phys_port_id: Operation not supported u1304:[0]/sys> But, if I bring the interface up (or unload / load the igbvf driver) Ithen am able to cat the phys_port_id of the vf and it matches the phys_port_id of the physical interface.quoted
u1304:[0]/sys> ifconfig eth2 u1304-2 u1304:[0]/sys> cat ./devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:07:10.0/net/eth2/phys_port_id 5ece9fbd9cd51546982e15c1f2c11e25 u1304:[0]/sys>