Re: minimum ICMPv6 message size vs. RPL's DIS

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:30:49AM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote:

Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:

quoted

Hmm, maybe we should update the icmp header to something like

That would be quite clean. Is it okay to introduce new names
like that in a uapi/ header (uapi/linux/icmpv6.h) ?

I would say no problem. But as I just realized that it could be a bit
problematic because the new defines have actually pretty common names,
let's cc David Miller. Perhaps he has an advice?

Greetings,

  Hannes