Thread (24 messages) flat view 24 messages, 5 authors, 2013-07-17

Re: [RFC PATCH] sctp: Don't lookup dst if transport dst is still valid

From: Fan Du <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-12 03:16:04
Subsystem: networking [general], sctp protocol, the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Xin Long, Linus Torvalds


On 2013年07月09日 23:11, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
On 07/05/2013 10:09 AM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
quoted
On 07/03/2013 10:33 PM, Fan Du wrote:
quoted

On 2013年07月03日 21:23, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
quoted
On 07/02/2013 10:18 PM, Fan Du wrote:
quoted

On 2013年07月02日 22:29, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
quoted
On 07/02/2013 02:39 AM, Fan Du wrote:
quoted
When sctp sits on IPv6, sctp_transport_dst_check pass cookie as ZERO,
as a result ip6_dst_check always fail out. This behaviour makes
transport->dst useless, because every sctp_packet_transmit must look
for valid dst(Is this what supposed to be?)

One aggressive way is to call rt_genid_bump which invalid all dst to
make new dst for transport, apparently it also hurts others.
I'm sure this may not be the best for all, so any commnets?

Signed-off-by: Fan Du <redacted>
---
include/net/sctp/sctp.h | 18 ++++++++++++------
net/sctp/ipv6.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
index cd89510..f05af01 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
@@ -719,14 +719,20 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union
sctp_addr *addr)
addr->v6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[2] = htonl(0x0000ffff);
}

-/* The cookie is always 0 since this is how it's used in the
- * pmtu code.
- */
+/* Set cookie with the right one for IPv6 and zero for others */
static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct
sctp_transport *t)
{
- if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
- dst_release(t->dst);
- t->dst = NULL;
+
+ if (t->dst) {
+ struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)t->dst;
+ u32 cookie = 0;
+
+ if ((t->af_specific->sa_family == AF_INET6) && rt->rt6i_node)
+ cookie = rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum;
+ if (!dst_check(t->dst, cookie)) {
+ dst_release(t->dst);
+ t->dst = NULL;
+ }
}
I think it would be better if we stored the dst_cookie in the
transport structure and initialized it at lookup time. If you do that,
then if the route table changes, we'd correctly detect it without
artificially bumping rt_genid (and hurting ipv4).
Hi Vlad/Neil

Is this what you mean?
Yes, exactly.
Hi Vlad

I thinks twice about below patch, this is actually a chicken-egg issue.
Look below scenario:
(1) The first time we push packet through a transport, dst_cookie is 0,
so sctp_transport_dst_check also pass cookie as 0, then return dst
as NULL.
Then we lookup dst by sctp_transport_route, and in there we
initiate dst_cookie
with rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum

(2) Then the next time we push packet through this transport again,
we pass dst_cookie(rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum) to ip6_dst_check, and
return valid dst without bothering to lookup dst again.
No, if the route was removed rt6i_node will be NULL, and NULL will be
returned from ip6_dst_check(). If the route still exists then we'll
compare the serial number with a cookie.
quoted
BUT, suppose when deleting the source address of this dst after
transport->dst_cookie
has been well initialized. transport->dst_cookie still holds
rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum,
meaning ip6_dst_check will return valid dst, which it shouldn't in this
case, the
result will be association ABORT.
No, removing the address cause the route for that prefix to be removed
as well. This will set rt6i_node to NULL.
quoted
Other way is invalid all transport->dst which using the deleting address
as source address
without bumping gen_id, problem is the traverse times depends heavily on
transport number,
and also need to take account locking issue it will introduce.
quoted
No, you are not missing anything. IPv4 doesn't use the cookie and
always seems to pass it as 0.
quoted
Yes, ipv4 will bump the gen_id thus invalidating all routes (there
has been disagreement about it).
quoted
IPv6 doesn't do that. In ipv6, when the addresses are added or
removed, routes are also added or removed and
quoted
any time the route is added it will have a new serial number. So, you
don't have to disturb ipv4 cache when ipv6 routing info changes.

Thank you very much for your explanation!

IPv6 don't bump gen_id, when adding/deleting address, and tag an serial
number with each route.
Doing this way loose the semantic of dst_check, because SCTP depends no
dst_check fulfill its
duty to actually check whether the holding dst is still valid, well most
other Layer 4 protocol
simply rely on ip6_route_output/ip6_dst_lookup_flow to grab dst every
time sending data out.
Look at how other protocols (tcp, dccp) do this. It is sufficient to
cache the route serial number into the dst_cookie at the time the route
was lookup-up and cached. Then the cookie is passed to dst_check to
validate the route.

Hi Fan

Have you tried the updated patch you sent? Based on what the tcp/udp code is doing, the updated patch should work correctly. If it does, can you re-post with attribution/sign-off
Hello Vlad and Neil

Could you please kindly review below patch?

Thanks


 From ec43c8ec27e16a72d87d6d4b07a1f494083261a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fan Du <redacted>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:22:35 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] sctp: Don't lookup dst if transport dst is still valid

When sctp sits on IPv6, current sctp_transport_dst_check pass ZERO
ip6_dst_check, which result in dst lookup every time for IPv6.
We use dst_cookie to check against fn_sernum to avoid unnecessary
lookup.

But problem still arise when we attempt to delete address
in multi-home mode, deleting an IPv6 address does not invalidate
any dst which source address is the same at the deleted one.
Which means sctp cannot rely on ip6_dst_check in this scenario.

To enforce multi-home functionality, introducing a sctp_genid similar
with rt genid, but only in sctp territory, so we don't hurt any other
rt validness against other layer 4 protocol.

Signed-off-by: Fan Du <redacted>
---
  include/net/netns/sctp.h   |    5 +++++
  include/net/sctp/sctp.h    |   11 +++++++++--
  include/net/sctp/structs.h |    3 +++
  net/sctp/ipv6.c            |   24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
  net/sctp/protocol.c        |    7 +++++++
  5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/netns/sctp.h b/include/net/netns/sctp.h
index 3573a81..83204db 100644
--- a/include/net/netns/sctp.h
+++ b/include/net/netns/sctp.h
@@ -129,6 +129,11 @@ struct netns_sctp {

  	/* Threshold for autoclose timeout, in seconds. */
  	unsigned long max_autoclose;
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)	
+	/* sctp IPv6 specific */
+	atomic_t	addr_genid;
+#endif
  };

  #endif /* __NETNS_SCTP_H__ */
diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
index d8e37ec..c344ea8 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
@@ -613,11 +613,18 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union sctp_addr *addr)
   */
  static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct sctp_transport *t)
  {
-	if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
+	struct sctp_af *af = t->af_specific;
+
+	/* We handle two sceanario here:
+	 * One: using dst_cookie to check against any routing information change
+	 * Two: using sctp_cookie to check against address deletion
+	 * Either of them force a new dst lookup for transport
+	 */
+	if ((t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, t->dst_cookie)) ||
+		af->check_addr_change(t)) {
  		dst_release(t->dst);
  		t->dst = NULL;
  	}
-
  	return t->dst;
  }
diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
index e745c92..9849915 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
@@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ struct sctp_af {
  	void		(*seq_dump_addr)(struct seq_file *seq,
  					 union sctp_addr *addr);
  	void		(*ecn_capable)(struct sock *sk);
+	int 		(*check_addr_change)(struct sctp_transport *t);
  	__u16		net_header_len;
  	int		sockaddr_len;
  	sa_family_t	sa_family;
@@ -946,6 +947,8 @@ struct sctp_transport {
  	__u64 hb_nonce;

  	struct rcu_head rcu;
+	u32 dst_cookie;
+	u32 addr_cookie;
  };

  struct sctp_transport *sctp_transport_new(struct net *, const union sctp_addr *,
diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
index 09ffcc9..343cd10 100644
--- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
@@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ static int sctp_inet6addr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
  		break;
  	}

+	/* force a lookup on all transport->dst for stcp IPv6 ONLY */	
+	atomic_inc(&net->sctp.addr_genid);
  	return NOTIFY_DONE;
  }
@@ -348,12 +350,20 @@ static void sctp_v6_get_dst(struct sctp_transport *t, union sctp_addr *saddr,
  out:
  	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dst)) {
  		struct rt6_info *rt;
+		struct net *net;

  		rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
  		t->dst = dst;
-
+		net = dev_net(rt->rt6i_idev->dev);		
+	
  		pr_debug("rt6_dst:%pI6 rt6_src:%pI6\n", &rt->rt6i_dst.addr,
-			 &fl6->saddr);
+			&fl6->saddr);
+	
+		/* use fn_sernum to detect routing change */
+		t->dst_cookie = rt->rt6i_node ? rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum : 0;
+
+		/* record addr_genid to check against address delete */
+		t->addr_cookie = atomic_read(&net->sctp.addr_genid);
  	} else {
  		t->dst = NULL;
@@ -724,6 +734,14 @@ static void sctp_v6_ecn_capable(struct sock *sk)
  	inet6_sk(sk)->tclass |= INET_ECN_ECT_0;
  }

+static int sctp_v6_check_addr_change(struct sctp_transport *t)
+{
+	struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)t->dst;
+	struct net *net = dev_net(rt->rt6i_idev->dev);
+	
+	return (t->addr_cookie != atomic_read(&net->sctp.addr_genid) ? 1 : 0);
+}
+
  /* Initialize a PF_INET6 socket msg_name. */
  static void sctp_inet6_msgname(char *msgname, int *addr_len)
  {
@@ -1008,6 +1026,7 @@ static struct sctp_af sctp_af_inet6 = {
  	.is_ce		   = sctp_v6_is_ce,
  	.seq_dump_addr	   = sctp_v6_seq_dump_addr,
  	.ecn_capable	   = sctp_v6_ecn_capable,
+	.check_addr_change = sctp_v6_check_addr_change,
  	.net_header_len	   = sizeof(struct ipv6hdr),
  	.sockaddr_len	   = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6),
  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
@@ -1076,7 +1095,6 @@ int sctp_v6_add_protocol(void)

  	if (inet6_add_protocol(&sctpv6_protocol, IPPROTO_SCTP) < 0)
  		return -EAGAIN;
-
  	return 0;
  }
diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
index 4a17494d..b9335d7 100644
--- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
@@ -595,6 +595,12 @@ static void sctp_v4_ecn_capable(struct sock *sk)
  	INET_ECN_xmit(sk);
  }

+static int sctp_v4_check_addr_change(struct sctp_transport *t)
+{
+	/* Always return 0, as IPv4 bump rt genid when address changes */
+	return 0;
+}
+
  static void sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler(unsigned long arg)
  {
  	struct net *net = (struct net *)arg;
@@ -1064,6 +1070,7 @@ static struct sctp_af sctp_af_inet = {
  	.is_ce		   = sctp_v4_is_ce,
  	.seq_dump_addr	   = sctp_v4_seq_dump_addr,
  	.ecn_capable	   = sctp_v4_ecn_capable,
+	.check_addr_change = sctp_v4_check_addr_change,
  	.net_header_len	   = sizeof(struct iphdr),
  	.sockaddr_len	   = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in),
  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT


Thanks
-vlad
quoted
-vlad
quoted
So please pronounce a final judgment.
quoted
-vlad
quoted
diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
index cd89510..0a646a5 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
@@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union sctp_addr
*addr)
*/
static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct
sctp_transport *t)
{
- if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
+ if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, t->dst_cookie)) {
dst_release(t->dst);
t->dst = NULL;
}
diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
index 1bd4c41..cafdd19 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
@@ -946,6 +946,8 @@ struct sctp_transport {
__u64 hb_nonce;

struct rcu_head rcu;
+
+ u32 dst_cookie;
};

struct sctp_transport *sctp_transport_new(struct net *, const union
sctp_addr *,
diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
index 8ee553b..82a420f 100644
--- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
@@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ out:
struct rt6_info *rt;
rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
t->dst = dst;
+ t->dst_cookie = rt->rt6i_node ? rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum
: 0;
SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("rt6_dst:%pI6 rt6_src:%pI6\n",
&rt->rt6i_dst.addr, &fl6->saddr);
} else {




quoted
-vlad
quoted
return t->dst;
diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
index 8ee553b..cfae77e 100644
--- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
@@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ static int sctp_inet6addr_event(struct
notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
break;
}

+ /* invalid all transport dst forcing to look up new dst */
+ rt_genid_bump(net);
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
-- 
浮沉随浪只记今朝笑

--fan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help