Re: [RFC PATCH] sctp: Don't lookup dst if transport dst is still valid
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: 2013-07-05 13:04:09
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:33:35AM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
On 2013年07月03日 21:23, Vlad Yasevich wrote:quoted
On 07/02/2013 10:18 PM, Fan Du wrote:quoted
On 2013年07月02日 22:29, Vlad Yasevich wrote:quoted
On 07/02/2013 02:39 AM, Fan Du wrote:quoted
When sctp sits on IPv6, sctp_transport_dst_check pass cookie as ZERO, as a result ip6_dst_check always fail out. This behaviour makes transport->dst useless, because every sctp_packet_transmit must look for valid dst(Is this what supposed to be?) One aggressive way is to call rt_genid_bump which invalid all dst to make new dst for transport, apparently it also hurts others. I'm sure this may not be the best for all, so any commnets? Signed-off-by: Fan Du <redacted> --- include/net/sctp/sctp.h | 18 ++++++++++++------ net/sctp/ipv6.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h index cd89510..f05af01 100644 --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h@@ -719,14 +719,20 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(unionsctp_addr *addr) addr->v6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[2] = htonl(0x0000ffff); } -/* The cookie is always 0 since this is how it's used in the - * pmtu code. - */ +/* Set cookie with the right one for IPv6 and zero for others */ static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct sctp_transport *t) { - if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) { - dst_release(t->dst); - t->dst = NULL; + + if (t->dst) { + struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)t->dst; + u32 cookie = 0; + + if ((t->af_specific->sa_family == AF_INET6) && rt->rt6i_node) + cookie = rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum; + if (!dst_check(t->dst, cookie)) { + dst_release(t->dst); + t->dst = NULL; + } }I think it would be better if we stored the dst_cookie in the transport structure and initialized it at lookup time. If you do that, then if the route table changes, we'd correctly detect it without artificially bumping rt_genid (and hurting ipv4).Hi Vlad/Neil Is this what you mean?Yes, exactly.Hi Vlad I thinks twice about below patch, this is actually a chicken-egg issue. Look below scenario: (1) The first time we push packet through a transport, dst_cookie is 0, so sctp_transport_dst_check also pass cookie as 0, then return dst as NULL. Then we lookup dst by sctp_transport_route, and in there we initiate dst_cookie with rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum (2) Then the next time we push packet through this transport again, we pass dst_cookie(rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum) to ip6_dst_check, and return valid dst without bothering to lookup dst again. BUT, suppose when deleting the source address of this dst after transport->dst_cookie has been well initialized. transport->dst_cookie still holds rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum, meaning ip6_dst_check will return valid dst, which it shouldn't in this case, the result will be association ABORT.
Have you tried this? It seems to me in the situation you describe, deleting a source address will result in fib_inetaddr_event getting called, which will call rt_cache_flush, bumping the rt_genid to get bumped for that network namespace. That will cause any subsequent calls to dst_check->ip6_dst_check to return NULL rather than the cached dst_entry for that transport. Neil